Help us improve by providing feedback or contacting help@jisc.ac.uk
H G

Heidi Green

0000-0002-2796-6898

Employment

OrganisationRoleDepartmentStart dateEnd date
COUCH HealthDirector of Health Equity Innovation, Researcher in ResidenceNot specified2024-09
Springer Nature (United Kingdom)Associate EditorNot specified2022-12
University of SheffieldIndependent Member - Data Monitoring and Ethics CommitteeNot specified2020-12
COUCH HealthDirector of Health Research EquityNot specified2023-062024-09
University of AberdeenAdvanced Research FellowNot specified2022-082023-05
University of AberdeenResearch FellowNot specified2019-032022-08
The Churchill FellowshipWinston Churchill Memorial Trust Fellow 2018Not specified2018-032019-03
University of AberdeenResearch AssistantNot specified2018-062019-02

Education

OrganisationDegree/titleDepartmentStart dateEnd date
University of AberdeenPhD Applied Health SciencesNot specified2015-072018-07
University of AberdeenMSci Pharmacology with Industrial PlacementNot specified2010-092015-06

Works

TitleDOIPublished date
Time to STEP UP: methods and findings from the development of guidance to help researchers design inclusive clinical trials10.1186/s12874-024-02342-y2024-10-02
“We are not invited”: Australian focus group results on how to improve ethnic diversity in trials10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.1113662024-06
A good use of time? Providing evidence for how effort is invested in primary and secondary outcome data collection in trials10.1186/s13063-022-06973-82022-12-27
Trial Forge Guidance 310.1186/s13063-022-06553-w2022-08-17
A good use of time? Providing evidence for how effort is invested in primary and secondary outcome data collection in trials10.21203/rs.3.rs-1769190/v12022-08-05
Trial Forge Guidance 3: Randomised trials and how to recruit and retain individuals from ethnic minority groups– practical guidance to support better practice10.31219/osf.io/tbrvm2022-03-09
Developing an online, searchable database to systematically map and organise current literature on retention research (ORRCA2)10.1177/174077452110538032022-02
Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison to not reading a book in bed?10.1186/s13063-021-05831-32021-12-04
An international core outcome set for evaluating interventions to improve informed consent to clinical trials: The ELICIT Study10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.0202021-09
Does Reading a Book in Bed Make a Difference to Sleep in Comparison to Not Reading a Book in Bed? The People's Trial- an Online, Pragmatic, Randomised Trial10.21203/rs.3.rs-239596/v12021-06
The People’s Trial: Supporting the Public’s Understanding of Randomised Trials.10.21203/rs.3.rs-239598/v12021-06
Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework-a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve.10.1186/s13063-021-05276-82021-05
Developing the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework– a tool to help trialists design trials that better reflect the communities they serve10.21203/rs.3.rs-180288/v12021-01
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub22020-10
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.10.1186/s13643-020-01471-x2020-09
Using systematic data categorisation to quantify the types of data collected in clinical trials: the DataCat project.10.1186/s13063-020-04388-x2020-06
A systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]10.12688/f1000research.22182.12020-02-05
Trial Forge Guidance 2: how to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed.10.1186/s13063-019-3980-52020-01
Using evidence when planning for trial recruitment: An international perspective from time-poor trialists10.1371/journal.pone.02260812019-12-10
Trial Forge Guidance 2: How to decide if a further Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is needed10.21203/rs.1.1/v22019-10
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study.10.1186/s13063-019-3687-72019-10
What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – The PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) Study10.21203/rs.2.439/v12019-03
Development of an online resource for recruitment research in clinical trials to organise and map current literature.10.1177/17407745187961562018-08
Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership - the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study.10.1186/s13063-018-2544-42018-03
A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials.10.1186/s13643-018-0696-72018-02
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.10.1002/14651858.mr000013.pub62018-02
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?10.1186/s13063-018-2535-52018-02
Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications.10.1186/s13063-017-2394-52018-01
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care10.1002/14651858.MR0000452017-05-22
‘Is that it?’ Using ‘explorachoc’ to engage the public with clinical trials and health services research10.1186/s13063-017-1902-y2017
Healthcare's dirty little secretNo DOI available.2016-10-18
Soluble pre-fibrillar tau and β-amyloid species emerge in early human Alzheimer's disease and track disease progression and cognitive decline.10.1007/s00401-016-1632-32016-10
A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials.10.1186/s13643-016-0308-32016-08

Octopus publications

Search options
3 results

Red flags raised by this user

0 results